there is a difference between believing in social justice and being committed to social justice.
Is Conservatism inherently racist? My hunch is that the conservative movement prioritizes and perpetuates racism and racist institutions. The conservative stance on liberty, family values, and ideological consistency are rooted in normative systems of institutional power. In the United States, at least, this power is synonymous with whiteness. Cultural, social, and religious norms are largely white hegemonies.
That’s too limited – power in the United States is predominantly white, male, and heterosexual.
So there’s that.
Another question is whether there can be reconciliation between conservative and progressive values? Can the adherents of these two world views and approaches towards life and governance reconcile themselves so that we can regain some semblance of something other than complete disfunction?
It’s a matter of both reconciliation and rehabilitation. The ideological adherents need to find some way to reconcile their differences, whereas the system itself is in need of rehabilitation.
I believe that one of the ways this happens is by engaging with individuals, groups, and organizations within our communities. The challenge, though, is finding the time to make the time and then sustaining some level of engagement long term.
One thing is for certain –
We cannot allow ourselves to retreat from public life. Democracy is an aspiration, not a given.
Please Defend the Affordable Care Act
This is a letter that I have shared far and wide, and now it’s found a home here.
I am writing to ask for your help.
When my wife was 8 years old, she developed Type 1 Diabetes, an unpreventable autoimmune disease that currently has no cure. When a person has Type 1 Diabetes, their pancreas does not produce insulin, a hormone necessary for the absorption of sugar into the cells. A Type 1 Diabetic must then regulate their own blood sugar through monitoring and injections of insulin to stay alive.
Several years ago, my wife lost her insurance. Due to her pre-existing condition, she was not able to regain coverage. Her test strips, insulin, and syringes, which are all extremely expensive, had to be purchased out of pocket. Visits to the doctor were rare. A trip to the emergency room due to complications would have been financially devastating.
Without insurance, my wife’s management of her disease suffered. Seizures due to low blood sugar, or insulin shock, became more common. They typically occurred in the middle of the night, and I would have to feed her honey or glucose until she recovered. Her body’s reaction to the seizure would then lead to days of excessive highs and lows which, if left unchecked, would have eventually lead to more serious problems, or an early death.
However, because of the Affordable Care Act, my wife was able to get insurance that covered her medical needs. She now has an insulin pump, which has made a tremendous impact on her ability to manage the disease and her long-term health. Her test strips are covered, so she can test her blood sugar more often and maintain better control. She can now regularly visit an endocrinologist to help with overall management, and she can get yearly eye exams to monitor and treat any onset of diabetic retinopathy.
Because of the Affordable Care Act, she has what she needs to stay healthy longer. There are still highs and lows, but there have been no more seizures or trips to the emergency room.
I know the Affordable Care Act is far from perfect. It needs a lot of work. I have no illusions about this. However, this law that so many people love to despise has helped my family. It has improved the quality and long-term health of my wife and best friend. And now, it is under threat of repeal.
I am asking you to take the time today and call your representatives and senators and tell them to Fix the Affordable Care Act, Not Dismantle It. Tell them to make it better so that everyone can receive the care they require, especially those who are vulnerable and in need. Tell them to fix the ACA so that it can work for every American without hurting those who need it most.
Tell your representatives to:
Fix the ACA – Don’t Repeal
You can follow up with:
Protect Pre-Existing Conditions
(Lack of coverage for individuals with a pre-existing condition is potentially devastating, literally resulting in lower life-expectancy i.e. death)
(So that Americans can change jobs without losing coverage)
No High-Risk Pools
(So that the sick and vulnerable are not relegated to prohibitively expensive plans with limited coverage)
You can also follow up with:
No continuous coverage requirement
(So that any lapse in health care does not undermine access to future coverage)
No vouchers or block grants
(Replacing Medicare with vouchers may not be adequate and are an uncertain and potentially dangerous gamble that would most likely impact the elderly and poor)
Doing some reading.
Came across the “Corner Stone” Speech given by Alexander H. Stephens in Savannah, Georgia on March 21, 1961. Alexander Stephens was the vice president of the Confederacy throughout the Civil War. In this speech, he lays out a number of differences between the “new constitution” of the Confederacy and the old constitution of the Union. These differences were improvements, “great improvements” in fact.
Working through the speech, Stephens finally cuts to the chase and puts the question of African slavery to rest once and for all.
And this is where things start to get nuts. Unless you are Richard Spencer. Or David Bannon. Or, I’d venture, Jeff Sessions.
The old constitution, in Stephens’ opinion, was composed by the “leading statesmen” of the time who saw slavery as a “violation of the laws of nature.” Jefferson, he states, I’m assuming Thomas, predicted that slavery would be the “rock upon which the old Union would split,” and in this, Stevens admits, Thomas Jefferson was right. BUT, the reason Jefferson got it right was wrong, fundamentally so. It was wrong because it rested upon the assumption of “equality of the races.”
The new government, Stephens states, is founded upon the exactly opposite idea, the idea that “the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.” Furthermore, that the new government is “the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.”
And H-O-L-Y S-H-I-T he’s just getting started.
You know those crybaby liberal fanatcs in the North with their whacked out ideas about equality? Yeah, they were just that, fanatics…crazy people! They were suffering, the poor souls, from “an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is (the fanatic) a species of insanity.” And this insanity, or one of the distinctions of this insanity, was forming conclusions deemed correct with “fancied or erroneous premises.” Erroneous premise numero uno being that “the negro is equal,” and “entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man.”
Science says so, basically. And basic logic says so too, since any conclusion drawn from an incorrect or illogical premise is likewise incorrect. So there.
And he seemed, at least in this speech, to be pretty confident in “the ultimate success of a full recognition of this principle throughout the civilized and enlightened world.” People will eventually come around to white supremacy, he says, in the same way that folks eventually came around to Galileo, Adam Smith, and some guy named Harvey.
To Stevens, this stuff was gospel, and he preaches – bringing God, Nature, Providence, the whole crew into it. Not only does science support the subjugation of the African slave and bolster one of the central tenants of their new constitution, but this shit’s in line with the laws of nature. Anyone who thinks otherwise, or any system that deems otherwise, is in violation to these laws of nature. Period.
And you know why, in case you were wondering, in case you’re still not convinced, it’s because God said so. That’s right, God. All this he says, is “in conformity with the ordinance of the Creator.” Ordinances, apparently, that we are not to question or inquire into. Humanity is thus served by accepting God’s law on the matter and founding all principles and institutions on said law. Period to that too.
By this point I’m just exhausted by the whole thing. He keeps going on about subjugation this, eternal principles that, and being true to ourselves, triumphing over all those nonbelievers, etc., etc, yadda, yadda. Oh yeah, and the Curse of Canaan, which apparently translates into some guy saw his father or somebody’s father naked and somebody got cursed and the later generations, Canaanites, are all slaves because they deserve it.
And we all know how the story ends. There was that business with Plessy, and Jim Crow, but then there was Brown, so the good guys win, and nobody thinks like that anymore.
Nobody with power or influence anyways.
Unless you happen to be the head of the National Policy Institute.
Sheezus, the mind reels, and I can’t even go there right now. But, it seems that, in some circles, not a lot has changed since 1851.
Oh sigh – to bring this lowly slime mold into my once pristine blog-o-space. I apologize to the slime mold. The slime mold has an important, critical place in the ebb and flow of time and decay. The slime mold does a nice job for nice reasons.
Steve Bannon, as far as I can tell, is a big ball of excrement. I imagine his presence similar to the ball of feces rolled around by the dung beetle, but large. Much, much larger. For example, if you took Veruca Salt when she blew up into a big purple ball, but then transferred that big purple ball of Veruca Salt as a big ball of poo right smack into the middle of my living room, stinking like all hell, and doing nothing worth anything other than mucking up the place, making a godawful mess and attracting diseases, that’d be Steve Bannon. In my opinion. Sorry Veruca, but I needed something for scale.
Steve Bannon snuggles up to the alt-right, which means that he empowers white supremacists and pseudo-fascists, justifies their atavistic ideologies and provides an outlet to hate speech and vile dispositions. That’s enough for me. I think he also devours kittens. I mean, why not? I’ve done enough research on him that I can’t find any reason to think otherwise.
What will emerge from this vile, stinking ball of poo that is being ushered into the White House by the pucker faced tangerine that we’ve (who us?!? not me!) elected to run this big constipated mass of dysfunction, only time will tell. Only time will tell, but if we’re going to hire racists and fascists to tear down the Washington elite that we, apparently, so abhor, I can only imagine the festering larva that will emerge from this shit show.
I know that many people who have been friends and formative figures in my life likely voted for Donald Trump. That’s their business, and I get it, I really do. My more liberal-intellectual friends may take issue with this statement, but fear and anger and feelings of being left out and cheated abound regardless of who you are, or where you live. This fear and anger is legitimate. The world appears to have changed, and there are communities and families throughout the country whose livelihoods have been diminished because of these changes.
And there are those of us who are shocked and disgusted by the results of this election and stand now incredulous. Who failed to listen. Who failed to empathize. Who failed to understand that there are other voices, voices thought unimportant, voices disdained for lack of education, or sophistication. There are those of us who considered ourselves enlightened, our ideals at the forefront of all ideals, or that the system would take care of itself. This is part of the how and why we’re where we are today.
There are also many of us who don’t get what this election has unleashed. I accept that many people who voted for Donald Trump overlooked his statements and campaign rhetoric as part of an act, and they voted for reasons specific to their own circumstances. But to too many others, it was not an act, it was truth. It was validation of hate. It was validation of white supremacy and domination of female bodies and minds. It was validation of discrimination and prejudice towards anyone who falls outside of white heterosexual norms. And it was an endorsement of violence. Make no mistake about it.
And because of this, there are many of us feel this fear and anger more acutely. There are members of our society who are more vulnerable, who will feel the fear and anger that so many others feel, but who will feel it through violence inflicted upon their bodies, and upon their minds. There are those of us who fear now, more than ever, for their own safety, for the safety of their families, their loved ones. Make no mistake about it – this is truth.
I reject racism, misogyny, bigotry, and xenophobia, all of which have been brought front and center into our discourse as a nation. Hatred, intolerance, and oppression of any form should not be tolerated, nor should it be ignored.
The argument that these things do not exist is not an argument, but a cop-out.